Announcement: Our new CyberLink Feedback Forum has arrived! Please transfer to our new forum to provide your feedback or to start a new discussion. The content on this CyberLink Community forum is now read only, but will continue to be available as a user resource. Thanks!
CyberLink Community Forum
where the experts meet
| Advanced Search >
Quote: Ok, got the text file zipped up this time and attached. As far as "Part A":

11.0.0.2516
SR#: VDE 130107-01

Is this what you folks are looking for?

I'm thinking as well that this might be a RAM issue. As I stated earlier, it starts out fine and gets progressively worse. I'm not a computer "nuts and bolts" guy. Is there a way to direct my machine and tell it where I would like for it to concentrate on "spending" it's RAM?

Can't thank you folks enough...


I wondered about a ram issue as well,, however it does seem you have plenty and the overall spec looks quite good to me. I wonder if it's worth doing a ram test to see if your ram is all working ? There is something not right here. I have a Win 8 setup and it all works perfectly, and in fact some options better than Win 7.
In case anyone is interested the offer is still open ! I just tried it and it worked ...
I tried a experiment in Win 8 64 and Win 7 64 and didn't have a problem as you describe. Not sure that helps you ...I assume you have all the updates installed ?
It will be 2 years before it's mainstream !
Quote: Any further help would once again be muchly appreciated.


Let's try some this...First does the video you produce, play in preview mode without any glitches ? or audio issues ?
In case anyone is interested, I downloaded and installed all ok, however it will not allow any updates. I tried it labels it as an OEM version.
Quote: But it would take what would seem up to a whole day just to produce my movies first and then I would have to burn it which would take another 3 hrs. PLEAS HELP!!


To burn a DVD can take quite a long time depending on the specs of your PC. A good high spec PC such as mine can burn a dvd video in about 20 minutes, this is burning only and not editing or adding titles.

To do that you need at least 8Gbytes of memory and reasonable cpu with a speed of about 3.5 Ghz, and a gpu enable video card. Assuming your are running Win 7 64 bit, that would let you burn a DVD in a reasonably shorter time than you are now claiming.

One thing you might try and that is to experiment on a short clip, say 5 mins, produce and then preview and see what it looks like.


You need to get there quick

This offer is exclusively available on CNET for 48 hours only or whenever we run out. Offer ends at 11:59pm PT on Friday, February 1, 2013.
Quote: Thanks Carl!

I was talking about it with Cranston and he pointed out the same reference to the 3rd generation CPU in the testing platform. I was curious if any user or beta tester had the platform that could speak more about how it worked. Is this the only CPU platform that works? Was it indeed faster? Was it free of artifacts in the produced video? Those kind of questions.

Just curious to know more.

Thanks Carl!

Kevin



I have the hardware as described and AFAIK it only uses one graphic option. I control that with LucidLogix MVP software. If I turn on the Intel Quick Sync the Nvidia GPU does nothing and vice versa. I have tried everything I know to get them both to respond and so far nothing.
Quote: Has anyone running Windows 8 and has a Intel sandy bridge cpu. Can you still use the Intel Quick Sync Video?


Yes I can confirm that it works for me, however I had to update the drivers for the LucidLogix software. I use VirtuMVP and I some else here uses a different version of LucidLogix and could not get it running.
Quote: Thank you Jaime-esque

I see too there's been some discussion here on inbuilt Intel 4000 graphics being a tad faster than PCIe GC cards which, if I go i7 Intel, should save me money. Thanks for thumbs up on AMD, though. thats a start!
John


I have both rendering systems, and I just did a test for your info.

A 2 hour video rendered with Intel Quick Sync took 20 minutes (1440X1080 50fps into an m2ts file)

The same video with Nvidia GPU took 30 minutes . However there has been more discussions on the output quality, which is still in debate. One day I will do some definitive testing.
Yes Michel, this technique works for me, so perhaps do a re-install. On my system when I do that it automatically uninstalls the previous version and then re-installs.

Worth a try, good luck ...
Quote: Thank for the feed back
What is it MVP Helper ?


I think I should have been more specific..It's the Lucidlogix VirtuMVP software. I think you use Virtu.
this is a real puzzle Michel and we would like to know the answer, perhaps some others will join in and help resolve this issue.

I also installed the new driver yesterday and sure enough PD11 would not even start ! I stopped my MVP helper for Quick Sync and then it would start. I then re-installed the MVP helper and all was again ok. So it seems for me at least, everytime I install and new Nvidia driver I will have to re-install MVP helper. Whether this is any help to you I do not know.
Quote: I have also an Asus Mothercard P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3.
Please find here the link
http://www.lucidlogix.com/driverdownloads-virtu.html


My M'board is a P8Z77 WS and it uses the MVP version of that software. My guess is that with the new Nvidia driver you will need an updated Virtu driver. I ran into this problem originally when I was trying to get MVP and PD11 working in Win8 and I couldn't until they updated the MVP drivers. Which they did and now all is ok.

That's my guess !!
Interesting that your MVP control is quite different. Mine came with the Asus M'board DVD and I initially installed it from there and subsequently from Logix site. Your version is quite different..Where do you go to get the download ?

Here is my screen shot
Quote: I tried again with the 310-70 driver after Windows7 update of the last week , without success for burning.
I uninstall once and get back again to the previous driver .
Please let me know the support feed back
Regards


I notice you are using Intel Quick Sync...this might be your problem.

I have one PC with this also and I tried an experiment with the old Nvidia drivers and the new and the video file burned ok both times,

However when I upgraded to the 310 driver PD11 would not start if I had Quick Sync enabled ! If I turned it off PD11 would start. There is an upgrade to the Lucidlogix MVP application which is used in this case. which is here http://www.lucidlogix.com/driverdownloads-mvp.shtml

I installed this update and everything then worked as before !!

Also a note...when you change the MVP options in the Virtu MVP Control Panel you have to stop PD11 and restart otherwise it won't recognise the difference.

Let us know how you get on,,,
Quote: Thanks Jim.


If he has a 3D BluRay player than you could select to make a 3D clip using H.264 Multi-View Coding, burn that to a BluRay disc in 3D

Put on your glasses and enjoy The Tv should auto detect the 3D.
Quote: SSDs are not highly recommended by some on the forum here, I have no personal experience there, however, if you let me test that new graphics card for 10 or 12 months, I'll write a detailed report for you...


I have PD11 running on two systems, which are both on SSDs. One, Win 7 is a PCIE and the other Win 8 is a SATA and they perform wonderfully. My card is a GTX680 2GB. I have no info on how well a 4GB might perform against this one. But I have no complaints, both in quality and speed.
Quote: Very simple test.

Let's make a clip, the best object for comparing is a human skin, so try to choose this kind of picture.
Next render it in 3 ways: GPU acceleration, Intel Quick Sync and without hardware acceleration (CPU).
Take a snapshot from the same frame of three productions and compare it in big magnification.
This is my method.

read it: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/the-sandy-bridge-review-intel-core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/9


PS. sorry for my English


Great idea, I will try and do something over the next few days.
Quote: Do not waste your time. Quick Sync does better job (as far as quality is considered) than GPU


On what do you base your observation, so I might try. As I see with my experiment, there is no visible difference.
Go to:   
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team