Announcement: Our new CyberLink Feedback Forum has arrived! Please transfer to our new forum to provide your feedback or to start a new discussion. The content on this CyberLink Community forum is now read only, but will continue to be available as a user resource. Thanks!
CyberLink Community Forum where the experts meet|Advanced Search >
The AI plug-ins for nVidia capability requires as a minimum graphic cards supporting CUDA 3.0 or newer versions, so the GTX260 performance column for the AI effect had nothing to do with GPU as it does not meet minimum compute capability requirement. As such, neither would your GT635.
Jeff
JL_JL
Thank you very much for that info. I did not look into CUDA at all.
I did see this on the features page for this card
https://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt-635-oem/features NVIDIA CUDA™ Technology1
NVIDIA® CUDA™ technology unlocks the power of the GPU’s processor cores to accelerate the most demanding system tasks – such as photo editing – delivering incredible performance improvements over traditional CPUs.
1 - Requires application support for CUDA technology.
But the age of this system and the performance makes me thing otherwise!
Guess it is time to upgrade! And with you advice, I will watch my video card selection a little more carefully!
Without trying to pass myself off as a tech type, I'd say your hardware has a LOT to do with it, especially your GPU.
To show it's hardware related, here's a test I ran on 3 different PCs, using the same original clip & adjustments/effects. The original clip was 1920x1080 .MTS & was rendered to AVC MP4.
You can see in the i7 920 GTX 260 column, that it took 2 hours+ to render that 1 minute clip with an AI effect! Your PC, rendering a 7 minute clip in 8 hours is (at least) out-performing that one!
I didn't do any comparison of GPU/CPU usage, but it's obvious what processes the FX more efficiently.
Cheers - Tony
Thanks for that table! Wow!
HUGE difference with the modern systems!
So I don't know if it the gfx card or processor - but likely a combination. Guess my old 2014 system needs a little updating.
I have an old i7-4770 processor machine with 16GB Ram and a dedcated 2GB video card (Nvidia GT635 - ok, i know it is old) on my desktop
I am rendering a 7 minute 1080 clip with an AI Styple Plugin and it is saying 8 hours to render. I thought that might be wrong and hit transform, and yes, it going to take 8 hours.
Checking resource monitor, only 1 of 8 cores is firing at 100%.
On the transform screen I have hardware acceleration checked off, and Nvidia CUDA is selected
I pointed PhD to folders with lots of images. But I am seeing my face come up in face tagging as unnamed many times. Only a few are tagged with my name.
For instance, photos of my profile, or that are rotated come back an unnamed. As I manually tag more of these photos of myself, will it make further auto face tagging automated?
If I add my name to a few face tags of myself manually, and re run the face tagging, will it get smarter and recoginzie more photos, so I will have less unnamed?
I have a section of a clip I want to replay (with reverse) AND have a speed increase. I set it to do it 4x however, the speed change will only take place on the first replay or the last one. I want to do it 4x.
Anyway to do this
Or do I have to cut and render the clip section at 4x the speed, then do the replay?
Thoughts or suggestions on how to do this a bit more efficently?
Is there a way to remove and effect or can I only use Ctrl-z.
If I have multiple effects or times added to my timeline, I don't want them to disappear.
Thanks,
VeePo
Why yes there is VeePo - click the - key on the left when you enter the FS'x properties
Is there a way to remove and effect or can I only use Ctrl-z.
If I have multiple effects or times added to my timeline, I don't want them to disappear.
I have aa phone app that does double exposure - but it is not perfect.
In the example with attached images. I took a photo of a pot, then moved it, took the photo again. then used a double exposure mode to show them together. Cloning them. But you can see the clone is transparent.
Can I do this in PhD? I would lik to also do it in PowerDirector.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
VeePo
Here is a better example of what I am trying to do.
A camera on a tripod takes two photos. The backgrounds remain the same, the person or object is moved, so it looks like two.
Here is a photo fo the same person in two different spots, but when changing the exposure, I was able to make it look like they are twins. But you can see through the person, so the effect is not great.
The Content Aware option if traced properly will make a duplicate, but not allow a different pose of the same person or object, taking away the realism.
Thoughts on how to accomplish this? Likely a few steps?
I have aa phone app that does double exposure - but it is not perfect.
In the example with attached images. I took a photo of a pot, then moved it, took the photo again. then used a double exposure mode to show them together. Cloning them. But you can see the clone is transparent.
Can I do this in PhD? I would lik to also do it in PowerDirector.
QuoteMy problem is that Newblue Essentials 6 simply won't load, even though it's installed on my c drive (in Program Files/Newblue/)
Other Newblue Essentials packs are also installed in this folder, and appear on the Effects Room menu.
The Newblue packs showing on the PD365 screenshot are Essentials Effects2, Essentials Effects3, Paint Effect, Essentials and Essentials7
I even bought the pack from Newblue a couple of days ago, thinking my original Cyberlink download may be incompatible through age, but this new one won't work either.
The effect I'm particularly looking for is Chroma Key Pro.
I've written to Cuberlink Help, but thought someone here may have had this problem also
I've been using Cyberlink products since PD5, back in 2005
Hoping someone can help
This is unlikely helpful. But I did managed to download the demo (non paid, with watermark) and it worked using PD365. Not sure if they are the same installer.
QuoteVeepo has kindly provided the trimmed audio clip. Thank you.
It turns out it was nothing to do with the MP3 file format, but everything to do with duration.
In Mix > Adjust Audio > Adjust length (Auto Remix), ADR first analyses the music to detect patterns in melody, rhythm etc. If too much of the audio clip is trimmed out, ADR is left with insufficient information & throws up the alert Veepo first reported.
The ADR Help file states: Note: the new audio length cannot be shorter than 10 seconds. It follows, then, that very short clips would not be able to be remixed.
The sample provided by Veepo was 10sec 463ms (0.00.10.463). I tried with a 15sec crop of the same song & there was no error. Admittedly, the remixed result wasn't worth listening to!
Having never previously used this feature to any extent, my observation is that the more that is trimmed out of the original music before remixing, the less successful the remix will be. Forced to used limited information, ADR will do some undesirable things to audio in the remixing process (e.g. change tempo dramatically).
PIX
Thank you so much!!!!!! If the error had that info - it would have got it!
QuoteThank you, Veepo, for clarifying the steps you took.
Using both the 365 subscription & ADR10 (lifetime) versions, I've been unable to replicate your issue & that alert. Whether I used MP3s, WAVs, M4As or any othe file format ADR worked as expected. Also, whether the trimmed clip was pre-produced or not made no difference.
Here's a captioned screen capture:
If you wish, you can download the exact MP3 file used in the screen capture & report what occurs in your ADR.
PIX
I really appreciate you helping out! Oddly I was just flipping through YouTube and your video came up! I was about to say 'What a concidence, I am having the same issue'
I tried you file and had no issues. Seems to be something about those files. Not sure what. They save, they produce, the speed can be adjusted, just not auto remix.
Cyberlink.com uses analytical cookies and other tracking technologies to offer you the best possible user experience. By using our website, you acknowledge and agree to our cookie policy. For more information on cookies or changing your cookies settings, read CyberLink’s Cookie Policy.
