There's a lot of missing info here and maybe a couple of incorrect assumptions.
For one, if the
Hardware encoder box is available and checked on the Produce page, then you are
definitely using your RTX 2080's NVENC. You can easily confirm that by starting to produce with that box unchecked and looking at the estimated time after letting it run for a minute or two.
If the box isn't available, please attach the custom producing profile (if it's different from the one we worked on previously) and your current DxDiag results.
Also, I imagine you paid a lot for the top-of-the-line RTX card, but most of that cost went into gaming capabilites that PD won't ever use. You could have saved lots of money and received the same NVENC performance by buying an RTX 2060/2070
card.
In addition to the system hardware, producing times for any resolution projects are greatly affected by the kinds of edits you've made.
If you only trimmed clips and added titles, you'd get the fastest possible producing times; but if you did any kinds of color correction, for example, that will slow everything down dramatically. See this
post where the OP detailed the effects of various edits on producing times.
In your project, you could check to see if there's any particular edit (or types of edits) that slow everything down. If you're comfortable sharing your project, you can pack it and upload it to a cloud folder and paste the link to it here so I and other members can check it out as well.
Sometimes getting a video to look exactly right comes at a very high cost in producing time, and it can help to see if there any alternate ways of making those edits that won't take so long to produce. It's possible that this project is one of those.
YouTube/optodata
DS365 | Win11 Pro | Ryzen 9 3950X | RTX 4070 Ti | 32GB RAM | 10TB SSDs | 5K+4K HDR monitors
Canon Vixia GX10 (4K 60p) | HF G30 (HD 60p) | Yi Action+ 4K | 360Fly 4K 360°