Quote
Hi Jeff,
So going forward, you can't use HA in 'Produce' using the latest NVIDIA drivers; that coupled with the fact we haven't been able to use HA in 'Create Disc' for some time.
Is there any point having a half decent GPU for PD anymore?
Cheers,
Andrew
Good question Andrew, probably something CL should address in requirements, not an end user.
But since you specifically asked, as you know, "Create Disc" HA for Nvidia was deactivated in PD15 from a patch and there is a thread that PDM indicated they would correct deficiency in a future patch (
https://forum.cyberlink.com/forum/posts/list/51325.page#post_box_269469).
Quote
As for the hardware video encoding disabled issue, it is a time consuming update that is required and they are still working on it. They did consider your request, but want to use all the resources to fix the problem, not to implement a temp one. They plan to have it fixed in a future patch update.
PD15, you know the story, never addressed. PD16, you know the story, never addressed. PD17, you know the story, never addressed. So, I surely wouldn't rush out and get a new RTX2080 or cheaper cousin for PD's current encode performance during BD creation.
That being said, some features of decoding still work and can be worthwhile to have a good GPU to do that task, especially highly compressed source like H.265. However, many bugs remain in PD, like it might switch to CPU decoding after a transition, after a pic, a color board, sometimes after a simple split. This can affect both timeline playback fluidity and decoding performance during produce. If your footage and workflow work with PD limitations, a good GPU could be worth it. If workflow falls in all the bugs, I surely wouldn't rush out and get a new RTX2080 or cheaper cousin for PD's current decode capability.
Why they would develop a "GPU Optimization" tool when the underlying encode/decode GPU capability with PD is so froth with issues the user community has shown for ages defies any sane user centric program development roadmap. Wouldn't fix the issues first be at least a thought, stated in link above “but want to use all the resources to fix the problem”. It's obvious they didn't, and didn't put too much effort even into this optimizer when the first patch is to "Fixes the issue that the program sometimes crashes when analyzing GPU capabilities." Furthermore, I challenge someone to identify exactly what it does do that's value added.
I suspect CL will address the shortcomings, it’s just a matter of when. Several other encoders I use continue to function with NVENC and post Nvidia 415 series drivers just fine.
Jeff