|
|
Quote
When pref is set to "24 FPS (Film)", the timeline is being displayed at 23.976fps. It's left to the editor to adjust what produce profile they want to use, at which time the frame transformation will be done for non-matching source.
Jeff
24 FPS (Film) = 23.976 FPS ?
What if someone wants 24 FPS and not 23.976 ?
I'm just verifying to make sure ![]()
|
|
|
Something else I don't get.
My clip is 23.976 FPS but for the timeline framerate there is only 24, 25, 30, 50, 60
For the output by using a custom profile 23.976 is available.
That means I import a 23.976 clip change it in 24 and then produce it in 23.976 again ?!
|
|
|
Quote
SVRT is the best choice when you've got a clip that PD has a similar output profile for, AND you've only made minimal changes, like trimming it or adding a few titles or transitions. Basically, SVRT copies all of the unchanged frames to the output video, which is very fast and doesn't require any producing.
If there are only a few changed areas in your clip, SVRT will produce them normally which will take some additional time, but overall the clip will be ready faster than if you had produced the entire timeline.
If you will be making lots of changes, like adding many titles or transitions or FX, or doing things like video speed changes, zooming/cropping, using keyframes, etc., SVRT will not be very helpful. Since it uses only the CPU for producing the changed areas, your project may produce faster if you have a GPU card and select that option instead.
The Profile Analyzer tool and enabling the SVRT track in the Edit room will give you an idea of how much of your project SVRT would be able to copy straight to the finished video. Also, not all formats can be processed with SVRT. Some have to be converted and produced even with no timeline changes, like WMV.
Oh I see. It's to produce faster.
That's not why I was interested in using it. It looks appealing because it show the output I want to have.
For that clip it's showing me 23.98 FPS and 1920x800. I wanted to use Intelligent SVRT to have that format.
I see I can make a custom profile with 23.976 FPS but the 1920x800 is not available and that's why.
Looks like I'm going to have to follow the steps that PepsiMan explains in this video (to have 1920x800):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOpCKvWB5RU&feature=youtu.be
|
|
|
Hello
I can't press OK.
Would be kind of ideal if I could.
What are the conditions to be able to use it ?
Is this article from PD10 still valid ?
https://www.cyberlink.com/support/product-faq-content.do?id=12805
My file is m4v format but even if I would convert it I will remove many parts, add titles and pictures and so on so SVRT would be unavailable for most of my video ?
Thanks
|
|
|
The MKV files (movies) that I edit are always 23.976 FPS.
Will this ever cause a framerate problem when exporting to youtube ?
They are also 1920x800 but with the added horizantal black bars they are said both in the description and on mediainfo to be 1920x1080. If I leave them like that and export them in 1920x1080 then for someone who has a 16/9 screen it will not make a difference but for someone with the perfect wide TV now there will be vertical black bars added and the horizantal (looks like they are fixed. I wonder why they fix them !! I think the movie industry ads thel fixed..) Looks like they always fix them because when I watch any movie trailer on youtube they have the horizontal black bars and when I press on the theater mode (next to full screen) look what happens.. see for yourself.. Now there are both hor. and vert. bars while if the hor. were not fixed the screen would be full..
The only solution is to remove the black bars and then export to 1920x800. I am trying the free version of PD I see there is an option for these but I can't try it with free version. Free only regular resolutions like 1920x1080 are available.
Second thing the few movies I have on mkv are constant frame rate but I read mkv often has variable frame rate.
The music video clips I have are variable frame rate..
Will variable frame rate cause problems like it does on hitfilm ? (I am trying hitfilm too.)
For those interested here is forum question I asked https://fxhome.com/forum/discussion/comment/122966#Comment_122966
3 topics here ![]()
23.976FPs
1920x1080 (1920x800 +black bars)
variable frame rate
Any input, whatever it is, is appreciated..
|
|
|
|
Thank you to both of you !!
|
|
|
Hello
I plan on buying the 365. Can I install the programs on more than one pc ?
|
|
|
I have a 4 year old laptop.
My editing aspirations are recent.
i5-8500 or i7-8700 ?
with
Asus H310M-A
16GB (2x8) 2400MHz
iGPU
250GB SSD
1TB HDD
550W
|
|
|
I was writing some builds from what I can get on https://www.pcspecialist.co.uk/
It's the ".be" I will order from but same equipment is there (.be has only french and dutch language)
I'm a little lost. There's at least a few variations.
This is the cheapest.
* 595 Eur
* Case: PCS 6003B
* CPU: i5-8500 (CPU Mark 11898 )
* Motherboard: Asus H310M-A
* 8 (1x8) GB RAM Corsair DDR4 2400 MHz
* NO GPU (Integrated Graphics)
* 1TB 7200 RPM, 32MB Cache
* Corsair 350W
I can also keep the same but upgrade the CPU (i5 8600(k), i7 8700(k)), is that not out of control ?
This one is more balanced.
* 953 Eur
* Case: PCS 6003B
* CPU: i5-8600k (CPU Mark 12778)
* Motherboard: Asus Prime Z370-P II
* 16 (2x8) GB RAM Corsair DDR4 2400 MHz
* 2GB Nvidia Geforce GT 1030
* 250 GB WD Blue 3D NAND SSD
* 1TB 7200 RPM, 32MB Cache
* Corsair 350W
There are some options for overclocking. But then it costs around 1100 Euro
because I am assuming that I need a better case for cooling purposes, power supply, processor cooling,..
If it's only to have a marginally better pc it's never worth it for me. And time is not an issue either when editing. Only choppiness I don't like because it frustrates me and I want to enjoy the editing :)
By the way, thank you all for your comments it helps me tremendously!
|
|
|
Quote
If you're really on a budget and you're going to be working with regular clips (not 4k/5k with high bitrates), you won't notice much difference in editing with HDD or SSD. However, your whole PC will boot and run much quicker from an SSD.
If you have to use two disks (because the 250GB will only have 200GB or so for all your non-Windows docs, clips, etc.) the cheapest approach for big storage would be an HDD. Higher spindle speed drives (Pepsiman wants to see >=7200rpm) are better at data transfer than the cheapest 5400rpm drives, and they shouldn't cost too much more.
Now that I know that I won't need that much for what I wanted I become greedy and I'm like "hmmm maybe I could edit some 4k too...
I can get the mkv files in two different formats:
"title movie + Blu-ray 1080p AVC DTS-HD MA 5.1"
Total bitrate = 25-40 Mbps (mostly around 25 Mbps)
23.976 fps
MPEG-4 AVC Video 15000-40000 kbps
1920x1080 (1920x800 + black bars)
"title movie + Blu-ray 4k UHD 2160p HEVC DTS-HD MA 7.1"
Total bitrate = 50-85 Mbps
23.976 fps
MPEG-H HEVC Video 35000-60000 kbps
3840x2160 (3840x1600 + black bars)
Is there a big difference in regards to the hardware needs between the 1080p mkv files and the 2160p ?
What if I upload the 2160p in 1080p on youtube ? What if I upload them in 2160p ?
The movies are always in 24p so I guess I'll stay in 24p for youtube, right ? Or I can covert them to 30p but the only advantages that I can think of is if people's devices are better suited to read 30p than 24p.
Or maybe there are advantages related to Powerdirector such as it can really smooth 24p into 30p or even 60p; like it can almost create new frames/images in between ?
|
|
|
I love it thanks!
What about SSD ?
|
|
|
Quote
welcome to the forum.
here's my penny for you but you have to do some home work.
CPU cpubenchmark score ≥10000 for 1920x1080 FHD & 3840x2160 4K.
memory - ≥16GB RAM 2666MHz
GPU - ≥2GB VRAM; speed check it out at cpubenchmark ≥5000. ex. (GTX 1050Ti 2GB)
Best NVMe M.2 SSD -> https://www.pcgamer.com/best-nvme-ssds/ ≥ 500GB
Best SATA III SSD -> https://www.pcgamer.com/the-best-ssd-for-gaming/ ≥ 500GB
HDD -> 7200RPM 128MB cache 6G SATA III 1TB or bigger
higher the CPU & GPU numbers less pain and higher the wattage means a hole in your wallet.
you will feel it especially if you're running under w10... ^^
happy happy joy joy
PepsiMan
'garbage in garbage out'
So I can't "cheat" and get a 14000 cpubenchmark score with 8GB RAM and bad GPU ?
I thought very good CPU with 8GB RAM, bad GPU and 250 SSD might do the trick
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I would like to build or buy a cost efficient desktop.
There are two types of videos that I will create (maybe it matters in regards to which hardware is used for these kind of actions) :
1) I import a full movie in MKV format (usually 25-30 GB). Out of this I make a 10 minute compilation. I want to be able to choose carefully and exactly which frames I want to keep without any choppines. Is this CPU, RAM, SSD, GPU,.. related ?
I would also like to have no quality loss when exporting; Is this related to the hardware or just to the settings and video editig software? What is less important is how long it takes to export.
2) I import 20-30 images in PNG format (usually 1-20 MB) to make a 10 minute compilation. I make the images flash really fast (like 1 framerate) some of the times but mostly the duration of each image is 1-2 seconds.
I will always add 1 or 2 audio files for background music and/or speech and I will always add text scrolling or flashing very rapidly. I will export in 1080p to youtube.
I'm trying to invest in the specific hardware I need and almost completely let go of the rest.
For example it costs 90 euros more on the custom pc shop I am on to have 16GB RAM instead of 8. Is it worth it or can I use those 90 euros to upgrade the cpu, or ssd or even NVMe SSD ? Remember it's for the projects I described above.
![]()
Thanks!
|
