Announcement: The CyberLink Community Forum is now read-only and will be permanently closed on August 31, 2025. All content will be removed. Please switch to our new Feedback Forum to share your feedback or continue discussions. Thank you!
CyberLink Community Forum
where the experts meet
| Advanced Search >
Quote Because there are other latencies that become bottlenecks. And no, HDD access is not related at all to this, the actual read/writespeeds are well below what a HDD can handle.

As for RAM - is used only for a few frame buffers, why would you think it would help/need to use more?


Ok, txs for this. Other latencies is a sufficient explanation.
Quote

The nvidia GT1030 does not have hardware encoding, it's useless for PD.
https://developer.nvidia.com/video-encode-and-decode-gpu-support-matrix-new#Encoder


I know this. So, the CPU should be loaded even more. Yet the CPU it still runs around 30% and it does not explain why the system only allocates 8GB.

While Davinci has a better "HW Consumption" and it renders in the half of the time for the same job ...
I am about to get another CPU and GPU (most likely a RTX 3080 or RX 6800XT) early next year - currently running a ryzen 5 (6 core) and a Nvidia 1030 with 2 SSD drives (one M.2) and 32GB RAM. Admittedly, not the fastest and not the most sophisticated system. But, for the frequency of upcoming videos I have to cut it does not really matter whether a development of a video takes 2 or 6 hours. I'll keep it running over night, anyway.

Yet, what bothers me more is when I start to render and I look up the system performance in the task manager I see that my Ryzen CPU only uses 30% at max. performance and from the 32 GB memory Powerdirector only uses 8GB. From the SSD Drives (the SATA connected one, not the M.2) only 1% active time is reflected.

Having run Davinci Resolve 17 (Beta) against it - Davinci makes full usage of the hardware.


Any configuration I could change? Parameters I can configure, at all?

Txs


p.s.: A reasonalbe question would be why someone should invest into further HW when PD does not facilitate the current HW as it could?
Purchased PD19 last week.

Issue still un-resolved.
Still not able to read 4k 10-bit 422 files (LPCM or MOV) from my GH5 into PD19 or Colordirector 8.

Very dissappointed!

Especially when you look into the PD 19 feature table where Cyberlink boldly claims
- import of 10-bit and 10-bit HDR files
- Apple mov ProRes 10-bit 422

WIll purchase something that works (Adobe or Edius).

Have been waiting since PD 17 for a fully functioning SW.
Go to:   
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team