Announcement: Our new CyberLink Feedback Forum has arrived! Please transfer to our new forum to provide your feedback or to start a new discussion. The content on this CyberLink Community forum is now read only, but will continue to be available as a user resource. Thanks!
CyberLink Community Forum
where the experts meet
| Advanced Search >
Quote Because there are other latencies that become bottlenecks. And no, HDD access is not related at all to this, the actual read/writespeeds are well below what a HDD can handle.

As for RAM - is used only for a few frame buffers, why would you think it would help/need to use more?


Ok, txs for this. Other latencies is a sufficient explanation.
Quote

The nvidia GT1030 does not have hardware encoding, it's useless for PD.
https://developer.nvidia.com/video-encode-and-decode-gpu-support-matrix-new#Encoder


I know this. So, the CPU should be loaded even more. Yet the CPU it still runs around 30% and it does not explain why the system only allocates 8GB.

While Davinci has a better "HW Consumption" and it renders in the half of the time for the same job ...
I am about to get another CPU and GPU (most likely a RTX 3080 or RX 6800XT) early next year - currently running a ryzen 5 (6 core) and a Nvidia 1030 with 2 SSD drives (one M.2) and 32GB RAM. Admittedly, not the fastest and not the most sophisticated system. But, for the frequency of upcoming videos I have to cut it does not really matter whether a development of a video takes 2 or 6 hours. I'll keep it running over night, anyway.

Yet, what bothers me more is when I start to render and I look up the system performance in the task manager I see that my Ryzen CPU only uses 30% at max. performance and from the 32 GB memory Powerdirector only uses 8GB. From the SSD Drives (the SATA connected one, not the M.2) only 1% active time is reflected.

Having run Davinci Resolve 17 (Beta) against it - Davinci makes full usage of the hardware.


Any configuration I could change? Parameters I can configure, at all?

Txs


p.s.: A reasonalbe question would be why someone should invest into further HW when PD does not facilitate the current HW as it could?
Purchased PD19 last week.

Issue still un-resolved.
Still not able to read 4k 10-bit 422 files (LPCM or MOV) from my GH5 into PD19 or Colordirector 8.

Very dissappointed!

Especially when you look into the PD 19 feature table where Cyberlink boldly claims
- import of 10-bit and 10-bit HDR files
- Apple mov ProRes 10-bit 422

WIll purchase something that works (Adobe or Edius).

Have been waiting since PD 17 for a fully functioning SW.
Go to:   
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team