All codes are going to have bugs and all companies offer beta opportunities to a limited few or general users. Everyone has a choice on participating. What's important to me is how a company responds to a very critical bug.
The Nvidia logo appearing, obviously appears to be an Nvidia oops.
March/2014, PD12 issue with Nvidia watermark for some GPU's and GPU encoding
http://forum.cyberlink.com/forum/posts/list/37958.page Nvidia forum, many other codes affected as well.
April/2014, Nvidia beta release that resolves the issue in PD. Since WHQL released nearly monthly, official fix right around the corner, most likely.
The PD continuous rendering bug with Nvidia GPU's, I put that oops in CL's lap. Yes, maybe Nvidia changed something but this really appears like a poor GPU memory call or the like that automatically initiated the PD render preview for underpowered machines. A CL design intent, "Automatic Render Preview"
http://www.cyberlink.com/support/product-faq-content.do?id=16451&prodId=4&prodVerId=-1
with absolutely no preference controls to turn it off like shadow files.
Sept/2012, PD11 continuous rendering with Nvidia GPU reported,
http://forum.cyberlink.com/forum/posts/list/24687.page
Jan/2014, PD11 patch to correct memory allocation error that causes continues rendering,
http://www.cyberlink.com/support/powerdirector-ultra/patches_en_US.html
Now there's an area for some improvements! Simply CL telling users to revert to a older driver for 16 months, rather discouraging.
Jeff
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Apr 09. 2014 23:48