Quote
When I'm doing Pan/Zoom I really don't want a fixed aspect ratio, I'm doing it with freeform to get the best effects (like panning across a portion of an image), or moving in and out on parts of an image (samples provided upon request). Basically I'm turning an image into a video. Being forced to use a fixed aspect ratio would severely limit my purposes for using pan/zoom. Do you really think that the 16/17 behavior is the way it should be for this function? What would be the reasoning behind it?
There have been several issues with keyframes reported, like this
one and this
one (which has since been patched, but seems related).
All of the "Magic" tools are specialized editors that generally make getting the desired effect easy to achieve. However, the trade-off is that you have many fewer choices than the main timeline tools allow.
You can do everything you're looking for with normal keyframes and the PiP Designer, and your experience with the Magic Motion tool will you give you a head start. About the only "advantage" that Magic Motion has over working with regular keyframes is that it automatically adds curves to the motion path, which can really give a smooth panning effect when changing directions.
I put "advantage" in quotes, because oftentimes adding a new keyframe causes the content frame to go off
the edge of the clip, and once that happens, it's
extremely hard to keep the content entirely within the frame since you have exactly
zero control over the curves the Magic tool automatically adds.
Using regular keyframes, you can use the Ease-in and Ease-out settings to smoothly start and stop any motion, plus you're free to resize the content frame to any size and aspect ratio, along with never, ever having an edge go out of frame unless you want it to.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Mar 24. 2019 16:19
YouTube/optodata
DS365 | Win11 Pro | Ryzen 9 3950X | RTX 4070 Ti | 32GB RAM | 10TB SSDs | 5K+4K HDR monitors
Canon Vixia GX10 (4K 60p) | HF G30 (HD 60p) | Yi Action+ 4K | 360Fly 4K 360°