Announcement: Our new CyberLink Feedback Forum has arrived! Please transfer to our new forum to provide your feedback or to start a new discussion. The content on this CyberLink Community forum is now read only, but will continue to be available as a user resource. Thanks!
CyberLink Community Forum
where the experts meet
| Advanced Search >
Would you guys recommend that I just take the original video, make 3-4 copies or the file name "1-4" and split what i have, audio, effects and all into 3-4 different parts at major junction points like song transitions? Or how else?
Do you think PD will be able to handle that last export? Because those files will be large and it has to go through that huge file.. or will it just use its already processed info and put them together quickly? Because in theory the videos are already HD so it should go quickly right. Converting Non-HD to HD originally is what takes up the time correct?

And yes Robert I agree. the static of the old film really is what sets the mood. But on the HUGE screen I want to be able to tell the difference between his eyes and the large black spots i call "Gruesome grain!" on the photos haha. Thanks for the input guys! Don't know what I would have done without you!!!
Do you think I should try in HD? In the end it has to be. at my work, The church were the service is, its going to be projected onto a 20'x20' screen sooo...yeah...Try regular first when i break it into thirds or go right for the big guns of HD?

And once I get it all 3-4 segments of it done what do I splice them together with PD?
Robert im going to try that right now.
Im not sure to be honest. The ting is. Here, at home i have a 8 year old PC, at work I have access to about 30 5000 macs and none of them would play it past 3.34. so does that means it could be a write problem even though the produced file says its 13.2 gb? Because if those computers wont play it then...nothing will...
And yes ill do that now.
the clip with 2 movies and a crossfade worked fine.
Big video still dead as a rusted doornail.
WOW....REALLY.....So now the small video plays PERFECT! not a flaw........
Ok ill do that now, In the mean time, look at this, this is the smallest video I exported. Its all there time wise but 7/8ths of the pictures are missing, music too.
No no no I meant the drivers are installed already. Finished it right before you said to set a restore point. I trust you guys, Im doing what is asked of me. What now?
TOO late brother. done and done with the drivers...
Yes it was originally an hour or so video had to trim it. I cannot get the original for it is a dvd....
Thry this one
Ok so Let me ask you guys this before I start hacking away at this video. I exported the thing as low as I could, it was only like 75mb. shouldn't that have made it even better than if I would have sized down the HD video by removing the Fades?
Thank you guys so much. I knew if I begged hard enough someone would have to help me. Here is a video. Do you want a picture as well?
Here is the file. What do you plan on doing with it? You cannot produce it can you because you donnot have the images, music or video right? (I'd be great if you could!!)
FredB: There are cross fades.
Sorry that was my fault. Thank you for reposting to let me know I needed to do this, Been up for 36 hours working on this stupid thing so im sure you understand!
ANYONE?
Robert2 S : The video is just so big it doesn't display a thumbnail just a black section, It's really just the clips themselves.

Jaime-esque : There is no transition at all, not even a picture (which changes ever 8 seconds).

But once again. 172fps?? Isn't that extremely fast? I though almost all videos are 30.
Go to:   
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team