Made me feel like I was up there with you, if that's you.
Quality was great, considering what you did to it, It's fantasic
-
I did a test trying some things you mentiond, My .mts RAW file x 2 is 1.07GB,
when converting unedited footage to mpeg2 BD the file is 1.6GB (I see what you mean) the file got larger.
However converting to h.264 the file was roughly the same size but the color was fubared somehow, it just does not look as good.
the upload will much smaller, but I just want to combine the 2 AVCHD clips into 1 and keep the same quality.
I guess I have to either upload 2 files, or convert to MPEG2 BD?
-
Back to original thread:
doing the above from RAW to h.264 AVC, I used the "Fast video....) and chose the Hardware Video Encoder Option.
I got as much as 60% GPU Usage on GPU #2 of all things, while GPU#1 was @ 1%, GPU#3 was idle,
However when the rendering got to about 50% complete the GPU droped to 40%, while the CPU all cores at approx 53%,
I would say it is utilizing quite well, I am very happy to report.
I dont expect it to use Multi GPU, but that would be nice,
I would expect that overclocking would just lower the percent of usage.
overclocking is only a small part of a GPU as there are many aspects, such as number of cores.
I wonder what would happen if I disabled SLI? hmmm. more things to do.
Edit: I forgot the image of my benchmark, it's 1920x1200 so I linked to it instead. was breaking the forum tables
http://williamwendland.com/images/support/pd9bm.gif
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Dec 29. 2010 03:29
EVGA GTX780 FTW
Intel Core i7 5930K
Corsair 16GB 2666MHZ DDR4
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB SSD
WD Cavier Black 32MB/500GB X4 2TB RAID0
Creative Soundblaster Z
Corsair Carbide 760T Case
Corsair H110 CPU Cooler
Ultra X3 1600 Watt PSU
SNT Trayless RAID Cage 3x