donski,
Your conclusions are probably correct, Cyberlink chose that path.
I think PD10 is perhaps the best in capability but others exceed it in terms of getting it up and running. Yes I know it is the trial version but some of the issues I have come across exist in the full version but for different reasons. For me personally though, I actually like working through these things.
My first introduction to Powerdirector was via a OEM bundled version which was a lesser version than the Full Retail version.
But the OEM version did do all it was supposed to do, it just was missing some features that were in the retail version.
I still have Powerdirector 8 Ultra.
The first Trial version of Powerdirector I tried was Powerdirector 9, which is what helped me to decide to buy Powerdirector 9 Ultra 64. The trial of PD 9 showed that there was vast improvement over PD 8.
Had I not had the experience of previous versions of Powerdirector, I might have thought that Trial is not a good example of what Powerdirector can do.
I have run Powerdirector 10 Trial on two different computers, I wanted to see what features were added over Powerdirector 9.
I knew about the HD limits, that did not bother me because I have Powerdirector 9 Ultra 64.
Powerdirector 9 and Powerdirector 10 are not a great deal different, except PD 10 does 3D, PD 9 does not.
I can testify that Powerdirector is for the price, a great Video Editor. None of the competitors can come close to the function, user interface and ease of use.
If you use the sample files for testing Powerdirector 10 Trial, the sample files will perform every function in Powerdirector 10. Which is what I use to test Powerdirector or to create DEMOs.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Jul 31. 2012 19:16
Carl312: Windows 10 64-bit 8 GB RAM,AMD Phenom II X4 965 3.4 GHz,ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB,240GB SSD,two 1TB HDs.