Hi guys,
I read what you write, hearing you loud and clear.
Flash-backs to beta team discussions, PD9.
I've mentioned it before, but I do come back to thoughts around the
"consumer" expression/label.
I would appreciate an explanation (from CL) what that label mean
to them and what the expression is meant
to be a guidance to; ?
- a video editor anyone at any skill-level can produce splendid results by click-buttons?
- a video editor that will work adequate on today's avarage machines?
- a video editor in which you can download, free, stuff that
others made- and thus sugarglaze your own product?
- a video editor that is
not aimed/marketed for pro, semi-pro or serious editors?
The price of the software indicates that this is not a pro editor.
And actually, that would be OK, if only the program could be stable and work as supposed to on a number
of different machines and MB's.
I am not sure,- correction; I doubt- that CL is interested in making a pro version, at least not in a #10.
I somehow don't see that they recognize pro editors as their market.
Competing with today's pro NLE's is seen only at a distance ahead.
I dread the possibilities of CL just adding more (complicated) stuff, building on #9, and drag the
problems and unstabilities along with it.
Would cutting the tracks down to 20 make it more stable?
Then do it.
Do we need options to save our own presets?
Yes.
Do we need to get rid of the jerks and flicker?
Yes.
Do we need to have full customization possibilities in produce?
Yes.
Do we need adjustable UI?
Yes.
Do I need 3D options for pip? Would be nice, but
not if it only messes up or only partly works.
Do I need plug ins?
For me, it actually depends on program. Will it be reliable/stable enough to handle plug ins?
Just something.
https://www.petitpoisvideo.com