4. I read a post on here saying not to use portable storage devices for watching movies as USB connection has reduced speed. I noticed no problems so wondering why such a misleading info.
Its not misleading. I demonstrated it in action. The read speed of a USB drive is terrible compared to an internal drive, and that's the good news. The write speed is much worse. That doesn't mean that people have not done it or that it will never work. It depends a lot on your system metrics.
What was intended was to improve the odds of you getting a good render. That means improving your chances through science. That means if you have the choice of putting your source files on a slow drive or a faster drive, I hope you lean towards the faster one. That means if you have the choice between writing to an internal drive or an external one that has an 80% slower write speed you might want to lean towards using the internal drive.
As you are aware, there is a ton of I/O that goes on in producing a video, and hard drives are the slowest component of the whole process. A USB drive can be 5 times slower. So, it just makes sense to go after the weakest link and minimize the chance for I/O bottlenecking if you can.
eSATA is a good alternative to external USB interface. Same idea, but runs at the full speed your internal drives run at. Many newer external drives now have both interfaces onboard.
See for yourself. Download the HD_Speed utility (
http://www.steelbytes.com/?mid=6 ). Then run it to analyze your internal drive speed. Then run it on your USB drive. You'll see a dramatic difference in performance.
OnTheWeb
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Jan 13. 2010 16:35
Win8 64-bit Pro Retail
Intel i7-4770
16GB DDR3 1600 8-8-8-24
MSI Z87-G45 Motherboard
ASUS GTX 660 Direct CU II OC 2GB GPU
1 TB RAID 1 (mirrored) Drive Array
Several scratch drives for video, TMP, pagefile.