Quote
Used the Profile Analyzer/SVRT to produce the video. Two choices are as follow:
65.77% As Source for 1280 x 720 workload reduced 35.46%
64.54% As Source for 1920 x 1060 Workload Reduced 0.00% Don’t know how adding these two percentages can exceed 100% yet.
It kind of goes like this:
Total timeline duration, 21.6667 sec
Skateboard.mp4 on Trk 2 duration, 7.6833 sec
00001.MTS on Trk2 duration, 13.9833 sec
Skateboard.mp4 on Trk 1 duration, 6.5667 sec
So, for the Skateboard.mp4 produce profile, the 1280x720, one has potentially (7.6833+6.5667)/21.6667=65.77% as source. The source is looking at total video content, not the editing features. So, it's independent if the Skateboard.mp4 on Trk1 might be modified because a full 16:9 frame 00001.MTS was on Trk2. So, this PD stat is correct. The workload reduced of 35.46% is also correct because for this 1280 profile only the Skateboard.mp4 on Trk2 is the benefit of SVRT so 7.6833/21.6667=35.46% is the reduction. You can easily validate by simply deleting the Skateboard.mp4 on Trk1, nothing significant encoding per the "Production" is really changed, but the Profile Analyzer will now indicate 35.46% as source for the 1280 profile, correct because 7.6833/21.6667=35.46%.
So, for the 00001.MTS produce profile, the 1920x1080, one has potentially 13.9833/21.6667=64.54% as source. So, again the PD stats are correct. The workload of 0.00% reduced is correct because for this 1920x1080 profile, since 00001.MTS had non SVRT features applied to it and Skateboard.mp4 on Trk2 is the 1280 format, everything needs to be encoded so workload reduced is correct at 0.00%.
There are plenty of other SVRT issues, but in this case the percentage stats are entirely correct.
AVPlayVideo, you might want to see if "Allow SVRT on single IDR..." in pref corrects your issue. Depends on source footage and unknown what you are working with.
Jeff