Announcement: Our new CyberLink Feedback Forum has arrived! Please transfer to our new forum to provide your feedback or to start a new discussion. The content on this CyberLink Community forum is now read only, but will continue to be available as a user resource. Thanks!
CyberLink Community Forum
where the experts meet
| Advanced Search >
Is a digital itermedary needed to better work with AVCHD files?
[Post New]
Hi All;

This may seem like a bit of a basic question, so I appreciate your patience! Here goes...

Recently, in using footage shot with my GoPro (3+Black) in Protune mode, I have started using their free downloadable program which converts the camera output to Cineform; do initial cutting and color corrections; then save the output file for use in PD12. Though a few extra steps, it has greatly improved the finished quality of the work.

My understanding is that by converting from the cameras MP4 format to the Cineform format the footage "takes" editing better - the larger (or less compressed) file size seems "easier" for PD to mess with. The GoPro "editor" or DI can input MP4 (which the GoPro camera records in, but will not accept AVCHD)

The other cameras I shoot with (Canon HFG30) have the option of MP4 or AVCHD. I've used AVCHD since I have been told it is slightly better resolution than MP4. But now I am wondering if a digital intermediary of some type may be beneficial to run that footage through. In a web search, there seems to be a common consensus that AVCHD is "harder" to edit - though I am not exactly sure why or what that constitutes. PD12 SEEMS to have no problem with it, and I thought I read somewhere that PD12 supports AVCHD "natively."

So my question is; would there be any benefit to using a digital intermediary to first run my footage through before messing with it in PD12, or is PD12 created in such a way as to obviscate that need? Is there a good DI that can be recommended? Should I just use the Canon to shoot MP4 and convert everything to Ceneform via the existing program I have? Am I completely off base with all of this???
[Post New]
In PD is common to add the original video, do the editing and in the end save video file according to what will create, DVD-Video (MPEG2), BluRay (AVC HD).
Youtube to MP4 is most commonly used, but may be another.
To me what makes the heaviest issue is the image size, also the highest bitrate.
Example: Edit video FullHD 1080 is heavier than 720 HD.
There is the rare case that you must convert your video to be edited in PD, this should be avoided because every conversion deteriorates image quality, even if it is little. AMD-FX 8350 / 8GB DDR3
SSD SUV400S37240G / 2-HD WD 1TB
AMD Radeon R9 270 / AOC M2470SWD
Windows 7-64 / PD16 Ultimate
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team