I think this little thread typifies the current flavour of the forum.

Robert made an interesting observation, quantitatively measured, of a new PD11 feature, he made a couple of light hearted points, to illustrate the apparently significant effect of the use of the feature.

djmorgan gave a subjective opinion, and opined that Robert was making a generalisation and, in effect, overreacting.

Robert had the courtesy to expand on his position to try and remove any misunderstanding and clarify his points.

djmorgan chose to "pick out the bones" but without any quantitative data for others to go on, again giving his opinion and asserting Roberts post was a "sky falling in" post and he was incorrect.

Leaving aside the next section, where Robert retired from participating.

Jeff then then quantitatively confirmed Robert's findings and passed a couple of comments on the feature process itself.

Myself and Tony quantitatively confirmed it as well.

From my perspective, Robert's observation on a new feature was a valid one, backed up by more than one observation from others, but the issue was clouded by an alternative opinion which was entirely subjective, missed the point and arguably, was a little confrontational, and so the thread started to dribble away into not a lot.

Ah well.

Cheers
Adrian







Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated. (see below)
Confucius
AMD Phenom IIX6 1055T, win10, 5 internal drives, 7 usb drives, struggling power supply.