You've pulled sections out and quoted me twice and now you're questioning my opinion against your statement of intent. I'll remind you of your question: "What's wrong with 1440x1080 ? " I was giving you my opinion, an answer to that question.
On this forum editors who mix 1440x1080 with 1920x1080 have reported problems. That would be the case with any video editing software where a mixed frame size is being edited.
1920 = the full width of a HD frame
1440 = a squashed framed video which has to be stretched by a Tv to full screen to 1920. Also stretched by a video editor.
The 1440 frame is not ideal, just a space saving formula adopted by some camera manufacturers.
When a 1440 width video is edited and output to 1920, the PC and software has to stretch every frame to full resolution 1920. The PC has to work harder and uses all the resources - more likely to cause editing/rendering problems.
I would not contemplate using 1440 as a capture or rendering format.
Just my opinion, others may disagree.
1920 = the full width of a HD frame
1440 = a squashed framed video which has to be stretched by a Tv to full screen to 1920. Also stretched by a video editor.
The 1440 frame is not ideal, just a space saving formula adopted by some camera manufacturers.
When a 1440 width video is edited and output to 1920, the PC and software has to stretch every frame to full resolution 1920. The PC has to work harder and uses all the resources - more likely to cause editing/rendering problems.
I would not contemplate using 1440 as a capture or rendering format.
Just my opinion, others may disagree.
If you quote me, provide the full contents of what I wrote and not piecemeal sections pulled to suit!