Announcement: Our new CyberLink Feedback Forum has arrived! Please transfer to our new forum to provide your feedback or to start a new discussion. The content on this CyberLink Community forum is now read only, but will continue to be available as a user resource. Thanks!
CyberLink Community Forum
where the experts meet
| Advanced Search >
PowerDirector 9 and Memory - How does it impact performace?
Robert2 S
Senior Contributor Location: Australia Joined: Apr 22, 2009 05:57 Messages: 1461 Offline
[Post New]
Hi Allen,

If you want your editing processes sped up more you could get a graphics card that supports video acceleration like Nvidia's Cuda or ATI's version. I know with the older ATI drivers you had to download a special driver to access the acceleration feature.

A graphics card is much more suited to processing video as they are built from the ground up to play games and deal with video.

Remember though it was not too many years ago that some of us had to leave our computers on overnight to let it process for 8-10 hours to render our videos.

Cheers

Robert My youtube channel====> http://www.youtube.com/user/relate2?feature=mhsn
James1
Senior Contributor Location: Surrey, B.C., Canada Joined: Jun 10, 2010 16:20 Messages: 1783 Offline
[Post New]
Hi, All
Yes and it wasn't that long ago where it took almost as long to boot up a computer LOL
Jim Intel i7-2600@3.4Gz Geforce 560ti-1GB Graphic accelerator, windows 7 Premium 12GB memory

Visit GranPapa64's channel for your YouTube experience of the day!
JL_JL [Avatar]
Senior Contributor Location: Arizona, USA Joined: Oct 01, 2006 20:01 Messages: 6091 Offline
[Post New]
Perhaps a different point of view, I’ll summarize a few observations I did during beta evaluation, actual results might be different with released PD9. I ran back to back tests with a totally clean system, win7, 32 and 64 bit, with PD9 installed on the box and that’s it. No anti virus, no internet, nothing else. No discussion here on a comparison to PD8 at all, just PD9. I also ran in 2, 4 and 8GB RAM configurations. All evaluation was done with Canon 7Mbps, and 24Mbps, 1920x1080 full HD video streams.

1) 32 vs 64 bit shows no performance change when cpu rendering or gpu rendering as long as what you are doing fits inside the constraints of your PC. On screen editing and movie playback also performed the same.

2) As expected, if the timeline complexity fits within the hardware constraints of your box, increasing RAM did nothing to improve rendering performance or user editing performance.

3) I kept increasing the complexity of the timeline, say several HD video tracks to play simultaneously, or certain fix/enhance features applied to the whole footage, the ram requirements go up. You can easily exceed 2GB ram and trouble abounds (choppy playback, pauses, had several crashes…) on both 32 and 64 bit systems, the same system and timeline with 4GB worked fine. With 64 bit and 8GB of RAM I could add significantly more complexity to the timeline simultaneously without creating issues. This was not possible on the 32 bit system. However, all 99 video tracks in full HD simultaneously played pulled my 64bit, 8GB ram box to its knees in both movie play and produce whether gpu or cpu. A produce to H.264, 24Mbps did complete successfully with 64 bit, 8GB RAM and failed with 32bit and 64bit 4GB configuration.

So in my opinion, as expected, how much ram you need depends on the complexity of your timeline. If 32 or 64 bit is a benefit also depends on the complexity of the timeline. For a simple timeline of dropping in some footage and applying a few transtitions and title or two, both 32 and 64 bit systems with PD9 can perform just fine. To work with complex timelines, 64bit and increased RAM is probably the only option.

The PC at time of testing was:
GIGABYTE GA-890GPA-UD3H, MB
AMD Phenom II X6, 1090T, 3.2Ghz, cpu
Nvidea GTX470, GPU
WD VelociRaptor 300GB, for OS
WD VelociRaptor 300GB, 4 drives, RAID(0) for storage
Corsair Dominator (4 x 2GB) DDR3 RAM
Corsair 850W, PS
win7 32 and 64 bit OS's
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team