Jay,
Here is the info from a file from my HF S21 showiing that it is indeed progressive. Whereas all from the HG21 were converted to interlaced as mentioned in the manual.
So when I return Thursday I will be running some tests to compare interlaced with progressive to see if indeed there is any difference.
George
PS: This info can be obtained by downloading MediaInfo who Dafydd told me about.
http://mediainfo.sourceforge.net/en
General
ID : 0
Complete name : G:\Canon_HFS21\Canon_041610\00079.MTS
Format : BDAV
Format/Info : Blu-ray Video
File size : 29.3 MiB
Duration : 10s 440ms
Overall bit rate : 23.4 Mbps
Maximum Overall bit rate : 24.0 Mbps
Video
ID : 4113 (0x1011)
Menu ID : 1 (0x1)
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L4.0
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 2 frames
Duration : 10s 343ms
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 22.2 Mbps
Maximum bit rate : 22.7 Mbps
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate : 23.976 fps
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.446
Stream size : 27.3 MiB (93%)
Dell Studio XPS 9100
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 960 @ 3.20GHz
64 Bit Operating Sytem
12 GB DDR3 SDRAM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 1248 MB Memory
Canon HF S21 & Canon HG21