Announcement: Our new CyberLink Feedback Forum has arrived! Please transfer to our new forum to provide your feedback or to start a new discussion. The content on this CyberLink Community forum is now read only, but will continue to be available as a user resource. Thanks!
CyberLink Community Forum
where the experts meet
| Advanced Search >
qualitative difference between PIP "zoom" and Pan&Zoom powertool
drosenbe08132 [Avatar]
Newbie Joined: Feb 13, 2012 11:14 Messages: 31 Offline
[Post New]
Is there a qualitative difference between the results of using the Pan&Zoom powertool or just using the PIP to zoom into a portion of a clip?

I realize that the P&Z is used for different purposes, but is there a difference in the resolution, etc of the clip?
optodata
Senior Contributor Location: California, USA Joined: Sep 16, 2011 16:04 Messages: 8630 Offline
[Post New]
There is no difference in output quality, since the same source clip is used in both cases. The only real differences are in the control over the pan and zoom that each tool gives you.

You can think of the P&Z tool as a quick and easy way to add that effect to a clip, and there is also the ability to customize the starting and ending locations, as well as the zoom level.

PiP keyframes will give you absolute control of all aspects, including doing multiple directional changes and/or zoom levels, and also pausing and making any other changes you'd like to add.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Sep 07. 2019 21:26



YouTube/optodata


DS365 | Win11 Pro | Ryzen 9 3950X | RTX 4070 Ti | 32GB RAM | 10TB SSDs | 5K+4K HDR monitors

Canon Vixia GX10 (4K 60p) | HF G30 (HD 60p) | Yi Action+ 4K | 360Fly 4K 360°
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team