Announcement: The CyberLink Community Forum is now read-only and will be permanently closed on August 31, 2025. All content will be removed. Please switch to our new Feedback Forum to share your feedback or continue discussions. Thank you!
CyberLink Community Forum
where the experts meet
| Advanced Search >
Any way to have audio tracks lower volume when voice track is active?
Mau1wurf1977 [Avatar]
Member Joined: Jul 14, 2012 00:55 Messages: 58 Offline
[Post New]
Hello everyone!

Happy PD user since version 11 and I'm now on 14 for a few weeks, and really happy.

Now I have a question, is there any way, maybe using Audio Director, to have PD lower the volume of a track when there is voice on the voice track?

So if I'm not talking, the volume of a track goes up, but when I talk it goes down.

Thanks
Ken [Avatar]
Newbie Joined: Oct 11, 2008 15:53 Messages: 1 Offline
[Post New]
I'm still only a PD 9 user, but you can place your video/voice and audio on separate tracks that you can manually adjust the level independently of one another. This is what I do.
Mau1wurf1977 [Avatar]
Member Joined: Jul 14, 2012 00:55 Messages: 58 Offline
[Post New]
Quote: I'm still only a PD 9 user, but you can place your video/voice and audio on separate tracks that you can manually adjust the level independently of one another. This is what I do.


Of course, but I wonder if there is an automatic way. A way for PD to detect when I'm talking and then lower the volume on another track. Doing it manually is a very tedious process
All vodi
Senior Contributor Location: Canada Joined: Aug 21, 2009 11:24 Messages: 1431 Offline
[Post New]
The only way is to do it manually on a separate track. It gives you better control that way. Win 10, i7
Carl312
Senior Contributor Location: Texas, USA Joined: Mar 16, 2010 20:11 Messages: 9090 Offline
[Post New]
There are third party Audio Editors that have the Auto Duck feature. Audacity is one.

Auto Duck lowers the volume of the main music when you speak on another control track.

You can do your audio in the Audio Editor then import the WAV file into Powerdirector. Carl312: Windows 10 64-bit 8 GB RAM,AMD Phenom II X4 965 3.4 GHz,ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB,240GB SSD,two 1TB HDs.

Mau1wurf1977 [Avatar]
Member Joined: Jul 14, 2012 00:55 Messages: 58 Offline
[Post New]
Quote: There are third party Audio Editors that have the Auto Duck feature. Audacity is one.

Auto Duck lowers the volume of the main music when you speak on another control track.

You can do your audio in the Audio Editor then import the WAV file into Powerdirector.




Nice, I didn't know that! I know Audacity, will check it out, thank you
Anonymous [Avatar]
[Post New]
I had Audacity on my computer, very briefly! I was NOT impressed with it. I use Sound Forge instead!
Mau1wurf1977 [Avatar]
Member Joined: Jul 14, 2012 00:55 Messages: 58 Offline
[Post New]
Here is the documentation regarding Audacity's Auto Duck feature: http://manual.audacityteam.org/index.php?title=Auto_Duck

It does EXACTLY what I was after

Thank you Carl!
Anonymous [Avatar]
[Post New]
I use the tried-and-true manual method for adjusting volume of music behind my voice. Using PD's audio mixing "room" I just click on the audio track for the music, creating a point at where the existing level will be attenuated, step forward a few frames, click again and, at that point, either manually pull down the level, or type in a new "value" in the space above the "slider" level control. Where I want the music to go back to its original level(after my comment), I follow the same proceedure, click once on audio timeline, step forward a few frames, click again and at that point, either drag up to original level, or type in original level's value in the box above the slider., Might be time-consuming but it ensures you get the wanted effect.
Mau1wurf1977 [Avatar]
Member Joined: Jul 14, 2012 00:55 Messages: 58 Offline
[Post New]
Computing: If you're doing the same task over and over again, you shouldn't be doing it manually as computers are extremely efficient at doing the same thing over and over
Anonymous [Avatar]
[Post New]
Hello, Mau1wurf1977!

Normally I'd agree, but occasionally, even with a computer, there are some things that you cannot just leave to "automation". For my own purposes, I much prefer to do the work in the way I described. Time-consuming, certainly! But it gives me the result I want.

Cheers!

Neil.
Carl312
Senior Contributor Location: Texas, USA Joined: Mar 16, 2010 20:11 Messages: 9090 Offline
[Post New]
Quote: Hello, Mau1wurf1977!

Normally I'd agree, but occasionally, even with a computer, there are some things that you cannot just leave to "automation". For my own purposes, I much prefer to do the work in the way I described. Time-consuming, certainly! But it gives me the result I want.

Cheers!

Neil.
There is nothing wrong with you using the method you prefer. Every editor should use whatever method they are comfortable with.

However I do not think it is nice to claim your method is better than another editor's method.

There is not just One Way to do a task.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Oct 10. 2015 14:10

Carl312: Windows 10 64-bit 8 GB RAM,AMD Phenom II X4 965 3.4 GHz,ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB,240GB SSD,two 1TB HDs.

Anonymous [Avatar]
[Post New]
Carl,

I never said, or even implied that "MY WAY WAS THE ONLY WAY!" I used the term, "For my own purposes" instead, which should be clear enough to anyone that the method I use works for me, personally. Those who want to let the computer do all the work, fine!

But for me, a hands-on approach has always worked best and given me the result I wanted.

Cheers!

Neil.
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team