I do understand that I represent a single customer but CyberLink needs to see that this thread represents many. I will agree that booting time for older versions of PowerDVD was an issue but was there any communication with testers as to the trade-off? You have a list of customers right here who might've complained about start-up time but if you would've told us you can fix it at the cost of auto-resume, we would've all asked you to leave it alone and would have be patient for a few seconds more.
I have to call into question your statement about BD-J encoding. I have a large collection (75+ titles, hundreds of discs from all continents) of Blu-Rays (TV shows, movies, music concerts, animation and even a game (Dragon's Lair), all these from major Studios and smaller independents) and they all work with the old resume function when I use older versions of PowerDVD (such as 9 for example). I can close the window in the middle of playback, re-open the program and it offers the option to resume which it accomplishes flawlessly. Then I try them again int PowerDVD 12, 13 and 14 and no such option appears. I am stuck watching the same un-skippable trailers and advertisements over and over again. Even worse, I keep losing my position when watching TV shows and I find myself giving up on the them or finding other means of watching it digitally. In other words, the start-up of the program isn't a problem anymore as I barely ever use PowerDVD anymore.
So with actual testing, we can see that BD-J isn't an issue (unless somehow all my mainstream and obscure discs all dodged the "majority of authored Blu-Rays out there that are mastered with Java". The program does start up faster so I will give you this but why are you continuously removing actual PLAYBACK features from this VIDEO PLAYER program while multiplying the tangential media library ones that a consumer looking for the type of program PowerDVD masquerades as (a DVD and Blu-Ray disc player program for Windows) would either have no or at best coincidental interest in?
This is software design. If CyberLink no longer has any interest in making a video disc playing program then stop pretending and make something else. Otherwise, why not spin-off something like PowerBlu-Ray and offer all the disc features under the sun for real enthusiasts with powerful PCs and an interest in having the best disc-based experience possible?
As it stands, PowerDVD 14 is my last CyberLink purchase. I gave it 3 shots (PowerDVD 12, 13 and 14 for a total of over 200$ invested with CyberLink) and besides faster load times, a picture of the movie poster and some kind of star rating for the disc I just put in (which can diminish the experience when you suddenly see a 1-star rating for a movie I was looking forward to watching...) it has only gotten worse. Learn from RealPlayer, Winamp and even iTunes' mistakes: have an idiot-proof one-button mode for our moms, focus on the one task you do, do it as best as you can, offer all the options imaginable in deep advanced menus and listen to your customers who pay, not focus groups you pay. Don't diversify and overstretch yourself. That's not who your Windows customers are. That's not what they want. That's not what anyone in this thread wants. Consumers who have plenty of free and pirating options but decided to support true efforts from a professional team at a cost of 100$/year. We update, we upgrade, we discuss in this forum because we care and we're given the cold shoulder because... well.. I can't reconcile that reality as we've shown interest and poured money your way but we somehow aren't worth an extra check-box to select in a menu somewhere. We're lied to about BD-J being a problem and paying customers are told that what we want isn't what paying customers want.
Sad really.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Nov 27. 2014 23:07