I am very new and first time to use PD9. I understand the need to look up at that diagnostic thing. I just now realized how.... difficult this program is turning out to be for other users. Also noticed some quick answers poiting at your "Obsolete" hardware have been said rather quickly. I also remember how fast Windows 3.1 ran on a 486 machine running without a match coprocessor and only 4 megabytes of memory and how bad and slow windows 95 ran on a pentium with mutiple times the power and memory. Having a slower machine should onlymean running slower, logically speaking, but here we have errors burning a DVD... now I could go back and do that with a pentium one or even lesser machine so why do we need twin 3.2 megaherts CPU's to do such mundane tasks?
Yes I could burn the video (intensive operation) into a file and then have PD9 choke and crash burning it into a DVD still. In the meantime, other programs..(I am using some free ones this morning) are burning the same mpeg file created by PD9 file to DVD fast and without all these "your machine is obsolete" comments glitches, slowdowns, freezing, rebooting etc.
I became disastisfied after someone made a coment to me on a previous posting of mine. I took it to the heart. Now I lost faith and wonder why, we, the consumer have to go through all this process.
Lets make a point here. You dont need gigaherts of CPU power or Gigabytes of memory to burn a DVD into a disc. Once the mpeg file is generated the rest should be a piece of cake.
I do know that if a good program fails is because a minor issue and I do understand the need to look at the Diagostic file. Hey your Video card needs an updated driver! sure... Hey your processor is pushing along with only 2 gigabites of memory! well that would certainly slow things down. Specialy with gigantic files. How many of you have processed 300 megabite TIFF files in phothoshop with only 2 gigs of memory? The program runs flawlesly... but it takes a while to process noise reduction and other cpu intensive operations but IT WORKS! it gets the job done before you "start to decompose"
Thats my point. If the code is done properly is should work. You may start to decompose while waiting for the program to complete task without a God Like speed of the Intel Core i7 with 60gigabytes of memory but it will eventually get the job done because the program is coded properly and it works. I read that your hardware is antiquated... hmmmm I wonder if this is only an excuse to hide the fact that the program may not be upto the task yet.
I too became frustrated with it and I would not be surprised if my postings get deleted however but not for being rude but for being somewhat skeptick about this blog and program.
I will refrain to post any more of my thoughts here since some gentleman here dedicate their time to help others. They seem to spend a lot of time helping on a daily basis. Even though I was told this blog is not run by Cyberlink... I think it should be so they get more involved in the issues and perhaps be more pro-active at fixing the growing pains every software manufacturer goes through every year.
My thoughts to you hardworking pros and knowledable Gents. Be more polite before you shot someone down with the dreaded *your rig is old* comments. We dont live to update our computers every time Intel or Nvidia produces a new and faster piece of hardware. our Rigs could easily be two and four years old with processors running the the Low Megaherts that are more than adequate to burn a mundane DVD. If the program runs too slow trust me I would be the first one to visit the computer store. Now when I see crashes and errors... I dont inmediatelly say your computer is too old.. there most be something incompatible or maybe there is a probability that our rigs have a defective memory chip? or faulty power supply that only shows the problem under load? (read here processing a video file) etc.
When I tell tech suppor I have error number... ########## they should already have it in their database and tell me.. oh it it was generated because our program stopped a this point due to.... you get my point? as opposed to Let me see your diag file so I can see how fast your computer runs.. It should be more like... may I see your diag file? we need to check if there are any malfunctions in your rig to begin with and well take it from there... Now thats more customer support like.
At this early point if my futile search to make PD9 work I am begining to suspect a programming deficiency overall. I dont really blame it on your rig unless is so outdated that it would take a decade to upload and preview a dvd video. It should not crash though... just be slower than I... ( now thats slow).
Cheers and Thank you for those who listened to me.
I will not post any more of my thoughs here. I wil only concentrate on making this thing work.
Update.. in my rig PD9 has been uptated, Direct X is at its latest update, I am running with 4gigs of memory and a 3.2 Gig Twin processor. I installed and reinstalled PD9. it works fine but it will not burn a DVD so I resorted to test some Free programs and they work fine. That does not fix the problem but it goes to show there is no problem burning a dvd with my current computer.
Marvin