Announcement: Our new CyberLink Feedback Forum has arrived! Please transfer to our new forum to provide your feedback or to start a new discussion. The content on this CyberLink Community forum is now read only, but will continue to be available as a user resource. Thanks!
CyberLink Community Forum
where the experts meet
| Advanced Search >
Trying out PowerDirector trial with new PC - some questions before I decide to purchase
cozment [Avatar]
Newbie Joined: Mar 29, 2011 11:24 Messages: 5 Offline
[Post New]
I recently bought a new PC. Before moving on, my specs are AMD Phenom II x4 955 3.2ghz with an ATI RADEON 5770 1GB video card, 4 GIGS of Kingston Hyper X ram, Windows 7 64bit. I'm running the latest ATI drivers. I was drawn to powerdirector 9 by the ultra 64 version to take advantage of my new version of windows. I created a quick 19 minute video of my son playing soccer. I decided to try to produce it to a H.264 file type. The video itself was filmed in HD 720 30 frames per second. All together, I had about 31 Gigs of video total and the H.264 format was going to create about a 3.1 Gig file.
1. During the process, I noticed I could not enable the "true velocity accelerator" for some reason. Is that something that you can't enable due to the trial version?
2. So as that was producing, I noticed it would get stuck on about 14%. The time elapsed would continue counting but the produced file stopped growing. I also noticed my CPU load went from 89-100% down to near nothing. So the software itself has obvously stopped. I tried this 3 or 4 times with the same results. I started reading on the forums here and saw there were issues with ATI graphic cards and having the hardware accelerator enabled. So, turned all of the enabling off. The video ended up producing after that so the hardware accelerator switches were my culprit. My question is, this video of 19 minutes took about 45 minutes to render. Am I asking too much of powerdirector?
I just want to make sure I'm getting the benefits of powerdirector's speedy processing power because I can't find anything else to speed up the process. Please advise. Thanks!
garioch7
Senior Contributor Location: Port Hood, Nova Scotia, Canada Joined: Feb 07, 2011 06:45 Messages: 852 Offline
[Post New]
Hi Cozment. I would say that for your setup, rendering HD, 45 minutes is not unreasonable. While you can get by on 4 GB RAM, 6 or 8 GB would be better.

A lot depends on what you did to the film. Transitions and titles, chapters, image enhancement, etc., all increase the workload on the CPU. A lot of the pros break their projects up into small segments and then assemble the PRODUCEd files in a final project to speed things up.

Video editing is the toughest thing that you can ask a computer to do. Glad to hear that you were successful.

Have a great day.

Regards,
-Phil
cozment [Avatar]
Newbie Joined: Mar 29, 2011 11:24 Messages: 5 Offline
[Post New]
So is the true velocity accelerator not an option when using the trial version? I was unable to turn this own during the file production.
Dave212321 [Avatar]
Member Joined: Mar 15, 2011 09:16 Messages: 125 Offline
[Post New]
I'm glad you posted this as I have a NVIDIA card and get frozen on 1% for a 10 minute video doing the same.

Later, maybe tomorrow, I'll try again and turn all the acceleration of also like you did.

I doubt its specific to ATI then.
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team