Announcement: Our new CyberLink Feedback Forum has arrived! Please transfer to our new forum to provide your feedback or to start a new discussion. The content on this CyberLink Community forum is now read only, but will continue to be available as a user resource. Thanks!
CyberLink Community Forum where the experts meet|Advanced Search >
Peter OzpeterContributorJoined: Aug 10, 2008 20:51Messages: 336Offline
Dec 07, 2010 19:15
Nice review.
I do wish they would specify which version of each program they are making comparisons with, though, as the constant release of new versions by everyone makes any comparison almost worthless without a version number given. (For instance, in another product review there of a current product from someone else they criticise PD in comparison, but they are obviously thinking of an earlier PD version).
All vodiSenior ContributorLocation: CanadaJoined: Aug 21, 2009 11:24Messages: 1431Offline
Dec 07, 2010 20:52
The review is fair and technically accurate. Too bad the reviewer didn't try real HD footage performance with 1920*1080 AVC files. That would have really shown off the number crunching capabilities of PD9.
Win 10, i7
Cyberlink.com uses analytical cookies and other tracking technologies to offer you the best possible user experience. By using our website, you acknowledge and agree to our cookie policy. For more information on cookies or changing your cookies settings, read CyberLink’s Cookie Policy.