I am afraid that Google translate will not work with program code...just a caution..sorry if you think this arrogant!!
Caution is best when so many are involved. I am enjoying the new capabilities of PD9...even with the "enhancement/bugs".

The arrogance is yours.
EDITED: I can also edit mi words my friend

Nicolas;
I think it was YOU who said

for goodness sake guys......dont you realise [sic] that we always have a topic to have fun with? Have fun!

Don't take offense so easily.

Whooppps my coverded friend.. NO I HAVENT SAY THOSE WORDS IN THIS POST. Sorry!

http://forum.cyberlink.com/forum/posts/preList/14279/68061.page

STOP YELLING PLEASE!

Sorry to offend..I will stop watching this post!

FredB... Have a nice and merry cristmas My friend.! and dont cover up your self that way. REMEMBER.. LOADING A COMMENT TAKES EXTREMLY LONG... LOL!

Quote: To CL. Thats depends of the complex video project.

Quote: I just recreate a 1 hour project inserting many clips, color boards, ramdom transitions, etc. Capture a 3 seconds comment and it only takes about 2 to 3 sec to load on the timeline.

In my first post the project was simple compared with this last one and has Andreas have post. But if i take this last complex 12mb .PDS project and produce a mpeg2 file, and then try to recreate the all test with that file, all imported wave file samples will only takes from 2 to 5 seconds to load into the time line (AND WITHOUT THE "NOT RESPONDING ERROR")

Okay guys, let's keep the tiny little quarrel aside
To sum it up:

@NicolasNY,
thanks a lot for all your efforts, all users who capture audio for their project will profit if this bug will be fixed. For me the problem already occurs for quite simple project without any transitions or effects. Just loading about 50 clips to the timeline. To render the project after all video editing has done and capture and place the comments in a new project using the rendered file is not an alternative. The complete video is not very handy you cannot see the different scenes where the little comments should be placed.

@Dafydd
could you submit this issue to CL?

Again, thanks to all who contributed I7-860, 4GB RAM, ATI HD5770, Win7 64, PD9 latest patch, Canon HG10 1440x1080 16Mbit/s, WD TV player

Best regards from Frankfurt, Germany
Andy

Hi - Have we got any solution to this yet? I have just finished processing the video element of my Project and now want to add "Voice Over". I am using the on board audio device (Realtek HD) with a standard (Electret Mic). I have added Music to one of the tracks without a problem but adding to the voice track seems fraught with problems - wait long enough and it happens fine.
I have regressed to version 2330a as I had problems with HD processing on the 2504. As the regression was such a pain I am loathe to try 2504 again at this time (is there a later version update in the wings).
I feel fairly sure the voice over issue is not hardware related but will continue to experiment. I have not included DXdiag etc as I don't beleive any more info is needed other than CL to fix this.

Don Gigabyte I7/4940 O/C 4.3, Noctua Cooler 10GB DDR3, 4 x 1TB, 1TB SSD, Geoforce GTX660 TI 8500W PSU, Windows 10 Pro 64bit.