Announcement: Our new CyberLink Feedback Forum has arrived! Please transfer to our new forum to provide your feedback or to start a new discussion. The content on this CyberLink Community forum is now read only, but will continue to be available as a user resource. Thanks!
CyberLink Community Forum
where the experts meet
| Advanced Search >
I reran my tests. I did not use MKV either but it did not change my results much.

All were 4K 4096x2160/30p, PD 19

Profile Encoding Time File [MB]
H.264 MP4 CPU only 1:20 594
H.264 MP4 Fast Vid Rend Tech 0:52 598
H.265 MKV CPU only 2:19 427
H.265 MKV Fast Vid Rend Tech 0:52 432


AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 3.5GHz 16-Core Processor
AMD Radeon RX 5600XT - XFX Thicc II Pro
32GB RAM
Sabrent Rocket 1TB NVMe Gen4 M.2 Solid State Drive
If I select the highest option in the Profile name/Quality list, I get rendered file sizes that look comparable. Like 598 MB for H.264 and 433 Mb for H.265. Both rendered in 54 secs for me so that seems comparable.
Thanks. I searched but could not find that clip on the web.

I'm not sure my testing can be compared apples to apples to the ones made in 2015 yet. My rendered file sizes are coming out at 115 and 146 Mb vs 422 & 591 Mb for others in the spreadsheet results. So my render times are 15 and 7 secs. I did use 10 clips end to end.

I am using PD19/365 vs PD14. Maybe it has different default res and frame rate settings for H.265 & H.264 rendering than PD14.
Quote Mojobari.
fwiw.
here's little test we've done previously GTX960 Performance Comparisons . follow the instruction and compare your results to others.

happy happy joy joy

PepsiMan
'garbage in garbage out'


Looks like Kite Surfing.wmv is no longer loaded as a PD 19 sample clip. I get jpgs and mp4 files about Landscape, Sketeboard, Sport, Travel...
Quote Mojobari.
fwiw.
here's little test we've done previously GTX960 Performance Comparisons . follow the instruction and compare your results to others.

happy happy joy joy

PepsiMan
'garbage in garbage out'


I'll try it. Does it matter that I have a AMD Radeon RX 5600XT Graphics card? Will the same load utility work?

Also, is the test is for 10 videos on the same track. ot 10 separate tracks?
I just tried some changes to the preview rendering setting under Display. I was already set at HD for my previous testing. Going to Full HD made my test video stop at 13 secs. Reg HD was 1:09 as reported in my table. The lower setting of High Preview Res allowed the preview Play on the Edit screen to play all the way through on the new PC. The syncing looked good with the audio as best I could tell. The video was quite fuzzy looking. But I can see where this setting could be used for testing future project along with non real time previews (they have good video but no audio) and full renders.
Quote

If you are trying to compare produced times of a file produce operation in the "Produce" room with a "Render Preview" in Edit mode, you can't do that. The "Render Preview" is limited to partial CPU power.

Do like productions with format, bitrate, profile, and other pertinent settings for a direct comparison of CPU encoding differences.

Jeff


I went back and ran the Render Full Preview on the new PC in the Produce screen. I got the same 5:24 so maybe I did do it apples to apples and updated the time before I posted here. It is a full render and not just a preview on the edit screen.
Thanks for taking the time to comment.

That is a typo on my old graphics card. It should read GT 730, no X.


The Render Full Preview on the old system was done in the Produce screen. It was estimating ~15 minutes at first but I walked away and the final time was shown as 10:03 when I came back. The new system render was done the same way (corrected 1/10/21).


I have not worked on a new project with the new system yet. I probably will be doing more Render Preview more to look at segments since it is fast enough now to use in small doses.


I'll give the lower res preview setting a try. Thanks.
I just upgraded my PC. So far I am a little disappointed at the performance increase. I guess I was expecting it to be like 10X faster instead of 2-3 times faster. I was hoping that in Edit mode in PD that I would be able to play the project I was working on without having to render it. It is better though. On my old system my test project would play for 13 secs before the video would stop/stutter while the audio kept going. On the new system it gets up to 1:09 before it stops. It does not crash, it just stutters. Here is my data. The last two lines are render speed times.

All the source video was shot by 16 musicians in their homes using smart phones. So they vary in quality but none of them are higher res than 1080p.
See if this helps you.


https://www.cyberlink.com/support/faq-content.do?id=16451
Quote I am 5/6th way through a project which uses both video and slides, nearly 200 slides and videos. ALL OF THE MASKS SETTINGS ARE GONE. Everything has reverted back to the 'no mask' setting. Most of the slides and videos have masks! This took me hours and hours of work, what has happened? How can I get all the settings back to what they were? All I did was install the latest upgrades. I've been working on this project for over 2 weeks. This is outrageous and has never happened before! What is going on?????


I was not in the middle of a project when I upgraded so I loaded a recently completed project to see how it looked in PD19. It looked like my masks were gone. I entered the Mask editor and noticed my settings were still there. To get them to display properly I clicked on the rectangle mask shape I chose and resized it again to the size I wanted. This was almost as much work as I originally did but I did have some radius settings saved I did not need to set again. Since this was a completed project, I only fixed about 8 masks and just saved the file. I probably have 20-30 more to do if I need to revisit this project.

I would recommend not upgrading if you are in the middle of a project.
Go to:   
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team