From earlier, I have used a few NB with another editor, so it is not a surprise to me the powers
they demand, at least some of them- and more keyframes> more powerneeding.
But it is still puzzeling to me.
I did a little test this evening: a 15 sec clip just sliced in a few bits, 3 simple fade transitions, a png letterbox. 3 tracks - no audio.
The first bit I keyframed with a little PDs colour adjustment. Then- a simple focus effect...but I had to slice the focus effect in 2 to move the position of it. Next; NB paint effect oil. I keyframed that effect
as well, but very light. I should mention that the 15 sec clip was previously produced in PD12 at the same default template.
(I have learned to ignore completely the 30fps/29.97fps - thing because it
seems PD can never be satisfied with either/or, no matter what you choose in settings/templates in
PD itself.Never mind.
I have also learned to ignore the fact that even though I untick audiotrack(s), the produced file
always come back with audio hooked on. Never mind.)
So, 15 sec to produce. It took 6min 42sec on this laptop to get it done, because at the start of
the keyframed NB oil paint effect- it came to a halt a long long time. Laptop working very hard.
What are your experiences with keyframing NB effects and production time? Do you solve it
by “produce range” in advance?
Windows 8.1 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700HQ CPU @ 2.40GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.4GHz
12288MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Filename | processingNB.jpg |
|
Description | ||
Filesize |
328 Kbytes
|
|
Downloaded: | 664 time(s) |
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Sep 29. 2014 18:25
Just something.
https://www.petitpoisvideo.com