Robert2 S;
I agree..so many problems are resolved by pumping up the machine to meet the program needs!! There are some legitimate issues within the program, but I can produce using PD9 2504 in Windows7 64bit and once I find a "pothole" that causes a failure, I just try to NOT step in it again! I too look forward to the release of the next patch!!!
And I wish I had a nickel for every time I heard..
WHAT DOES THE GRAPHIC CARD HAVE TO DO WITH my_specific_issue
The graphic card has EVERYTHING to do with the operation of a VIDEO RENDERING program!!!
Graphic processing is part of EVERY aspect of the production..sound, burning, transitions, converting, previewing.....EVERY aspect!! Get it?
I try to imagine how many times Dafydd has written "Could we see the three bits requested?"

and it helps to make me

calm....
EVERYONE..listen up..these folks are designated as Senior Contributors because they have had the experience (good and bad) with the program to know what is needed. It shouldn't be a discussion..you have a problem.

..explain your problem, provide the machine details and attachments needed for us to "SEE" the problem you are having... listen to the advice and explanation of the reason for the problem...then, participate in the solution.
or go somewhere else and complain. There has to be a "I HATE CYBERLINK" or "I HATE VIDEO EDITING SOFTWARE" Forum somewhere on the Internet where you can visit and vent!!!.
And just so I can get all my RANT out at once...If you have "product A" and it "has no problem, so why should PD9" (another statement I am tired of hearing)...well, I suggest you get a refund (or throw PD out the window) and go USE "product A"!!!!!!
This particular forum is meant for people who want to find solutions to problems using PD9..I think!!?
Disclaimer...ok maybe I am not as CALM as I claim to be
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at Mar 02. 2011 02:53